Legal Opinion
Holmes v. City of Wilmington
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 19, 2017No. Civ. No. 13-842-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, Senior District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 13, 2013, Medford Holmes (“Holmes”) filed a complaint against defendants City of Wilmington (the “City”), police detective Kimberly Pfaff (“Pfaff’), police detective Randy Nowell (“Nowell”), and John Doe numbers 1 through 10 (collectively, the “defendants”) asserting various federal civil rights and state law tort claims. (D.I. 1) After Holmes death, the court granted a motion to substitute Patricia Holmes, the personal representative of Holmes’ estate, as plaintiff in this case (the *782“plaintiff’). (D.I. 15) Currently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cornelious v. MacNamaraDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Earl v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021