State ex rel. Curtis v. Howe
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
This was an alternative writ of mandate, issued by the Marion Superior Court at general term, in the name- of the State of Indiana, upon the relation of Lyman W. Curtis, against the Hon. Daniel W. Howe, one of the judges of that court, the object of which was to require him to proceed with the trial of a certain cause pend*19ing before him in said court, at special term, in which the relator herein was plaintiff, and one Marcus L. Hare was defendant.
The defendant, Howe, made return to the writ, and such proceedings were thereupon had as that a writ of mandate was refused, and judgment was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simonton v. WinterSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Cavanaugh v. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Sunman v. BrewinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Cuyler v. VanderwerkNew York Supreme Court · 1800
- McIntosh v. HobenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Carrothers v. CarrothersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Eckelberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Schwede v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Davenport, Rock Island & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DeYaegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.