Schwede v. Hemrich
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.' — Hon. William E. Bell, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered hy '
Hadley, J.
Appellants brought this suit against respondent to recover damages alleged to- be due by reason of breach of contract. On the 16th day of March, 1895, appellants were the owners of lot 5 in block 6 of Judkins’ Addition to the City of Seattle. The complaint alleges that said lot had a water frontage of 60 feet, and that it adjoined a certain tract of tide lands of the first class; that, by reason of the ownership and location of said lot, appellants had a preference right to* purchase the tide lands immediately in front thereof; that such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henderson v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Klatt v. ZeraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Gerrish v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- State ex rel. Curtis v. HoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Cuyler v. VanderwerkNew York Supreme Court · 1800
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- King County v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Arthur v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- City of Spokane v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Austin v. WhitcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Peterson v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.