The Painting Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
The Painting Company, a closely held Ohio corporation, appeals a March 23, 2000 Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) which found The Painting Company liable for engaging in several counts of anti-union activity in violation of Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA” or the “Act,” which corresponds to Sections 158(a)(1) and (3) of Title 29 of the United States Code). Respondent cross-appeals, seeking enforcement of the Board’s decision. For the following reasons, this Court ENFORCES the decision…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- GREGORY C. SASSÉ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICECourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Bowling Transportation, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Rieth-Riley Constr. Co. v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- William J. Lang Land Clearing, Inc. v. ADMINISTRATOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISIONDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.