Legal Opinion

Navistar, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2015No. 2014-0140PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} Under Ohio’s 2005 tax-reform legislation, the new commercial-activity tax (“CAT”) was enacted “to replace the existing corporate-franchise and personal-property taxes,” which were phased out under that legislation for industrial corporations like Navistar, Inc. Beaver Excavating Co. v. Testa, 134 Ohio St.3d 565, 2012-Ohio-5776, 983 N.E.2d 1317, ¶ 23, citing Am.Sub.H.B. No. 66, 151 Ohio Laws, Part II, 2868; R.C. 5733.01(G)(2). In this appeal, appellant, Navistar, Inc., claims that it is due a credit against the CAT.

{¶ 2} According to the testimony of employees of the Department of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Grover v. BartschOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Beaver Excavating Co. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Crutchfield Corp. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Corrigan v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Cox v. Youngstown Civ. Serv. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Breech v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API