Navistar, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} Under Ohio’s 2005 tax-reform legislation, the new commercial-activity tax (“CAT”) was enacted “to replace the existing corporate-franchise and personal-property taxes,” which were phased out under that legislation for industrial corporations like Navistar, Inc. Beaver Excavating Co. v. Testa, 134 Ohio St.3d 565, 2012-Ohio-5776, 983 N.E.2d 1317, ¶ 23, citing Am.Sub.H.B. No. 66, 151 Ohio Laws, Part II, 2868; R.C. 5733.01(G)(2). In this appeal, appellant, Navistar, Inc., claims that it is due a credit against the CAT.
{¶ 2} According to the testimony of employees of the Department of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Grover v. BartschOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Beaver Excavating Co. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crutchfield Corp. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Corrigan v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State ex rel. Cox v. Youngstown Civ. Serv. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Breech v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.