Legal Opinion

State v. Venturi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2000No. 97-3342C3; CA A102224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), following a trial to the court on stipulated facts. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the controlled substance seized from a backpack found in his vehicle. He also assigns error to the trial court’s order that he pay $500 in court-appointed attorney fees. We affirm.

At the hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress, Officer Kelley testified about the circumstances leading up to and including defendant’s arrest. Around 2:32 a.m., Kelley noticed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. GlandonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API