Legal Opinion

State v. Glandon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2000No. 973588C2; CA A100464PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P.J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), following a trial to the court on stipulated facts. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the controlled substance found in a front pocket of his pants. We affirm.

At the hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress, Officer Whipple testified about the circumstances leading up to the discovery of the methamphetamine. At 2:30 a.m., Whipple was sitting in his patrol car in the parking lot of the Medford Shopping Center. He observed defendant walking across the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API