State v. Glandon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P.J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), following a trial to the court on stipulated facts. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the controlled substance found in a front pocket of his pants. We affirm.
At the hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress, Officer Whipple testified about the circumstances leading up to the discovery of the methamphetamine. At 2:30 a.m., Whipple was sitting in his patrol car in the parking lot of the Medford Shopping Center. He observed defendant walking across the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. AtkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003