Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Longacre

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2005No. 200,116-5PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Fairhurst, J.

Clayton E. Longacre appeals the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board’s (the Board) findings that he committed three acts of misconduct and its recommendation that he be suspended for 60 days and required to attend 30 hours of continuing legal education (CLE) courses. He contends on appeal that (1) the WSBA did not prove the alleged misconduct by a clear preponderance of the evidence and (2) that the recommended sanction of suspension is too harsh, asking instead for a reprimand. Longacre also appeals the Board’s denial of his motion for additional…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against LongacreWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API