Legal Opinion

Jack Higgins v. Don Smith, Superintendent of Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-3224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

This is a habeas corpus case. Petitioner asserts that he was given a sentence in excess of that permitted by state law because an amendment to Missouri’s drug laws that reduced the maximum possible sentence, see Mo.Rev.Stat. § 195.211, was applicable to his case but mistakenly not applied to it by his sentencing court. (See State v. Freeman, 791 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Mo.Ct.App.1990), holding that Mo.Rev. Stat. § 1.160(2) makes the relevant amendment applicable to petitioner.) The district court agreed with petitioner’s construction of state law (as we do),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Kenneth Jones v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edwin Marrero v. Richard IvesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Thomas John MaybeckCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Elbert Whaley Jones v. Gary Jerrison, Parole Officer Cranston Mitchell, Board of Probation and Parole and the Attorney General of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Robert J. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Walter Dean Waring v. Paul Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Missouri Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API