Legal Opinion

The People v. Hao Lin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2017No. 10PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stein, J.

In this appeal challenging convictions for driving while intoxicated, defendant argues that the Confrontation Clause was violated where the police officer who testified at trial regarding defendant’s breath test directly observed the test, but did not personally administer it. Because the officer testified based on his own observations and conclusions, rather than as a surrogate for his partner who actually administered the test, and none of the nontestifying officer’s hearsay statements were admitted against defendant, we hold that defendant’s rights under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. People v. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. Flores (Jonathan)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
  3. People v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. People v. Hao LinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  5. The People v. Cid C. FranklinNew York Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API