Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Moreno

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1938No. Crim. 3097PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of selling, furnishing and giving away flowering tops and leaves of Indian hemp in violation of the State Narcotic Act. The defendant also appeals from the verdict and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The appeal from the verdict must be dismissed for the reason that it is unauthorized by law. (People v. Bratten, 137 Cal. App. 658 [31 Pac. (2d) 210]; People v. Wilson, 7 Cal. App. (2d) 543 [46 Pac. (2d) 229].)

At about 10:30 P. M. an employee of Port McArthur, who was assigned by the commander of the fort to act as an “operator” for the police…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. People v. HeadleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. SantoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API