Legal Opinion

McMurray v. Bateman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1965No. 23023PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

The defendant, plaintiff in error here, contends his general demurrer should have been sustained because the contract between the parties, made a part of the petition and upon which the plaintiff’s cause is based, is unilateral and unenforceable. A contract is unilateral in the sense that renders it invalid “when one party to it is bound and the other is not, or when one party gets something and the other nothing.” Lowery Lock Co. v. Wright, 154 Ga. 867 (1e) (115 SE 801). While “a promise of another is a good consideration for a promise” (Code § 20-304), “ ‘the promise in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. McCaw Manufacturing Co. v. Felder & RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Brown v. BowmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Griffin v. VandegriffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Reddy v. Community Health Foundation of ManWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rash v. Toccoa Clinic Medical AssociatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Thomas v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Pine Valley Apartments Ltd. Partnership v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Geocaris v. Surgical Consultants, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API