Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Jordan
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit was upon a policy of insurance, and the pleading was in short by consent.
The issues of fact were submitted to a jury, and the verdict and judgment thereon was for the plaintiff for the amount sued for, with interest.
The appellant insists that it was entitled to the affirmative charge on the grounds that the evidence did not show that death was the result of bodily injury sustained through accidental means, and resulting directly,, independently, and exclusively of all other means.
Plaintiff offered in evidence the policy of insurance issued to assured, the certificate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Equitable Accident Insurance v. OsbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Gulf States Creosoting Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Standard Acc. Ins. of Detroit v. HoehnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. Agricola FurnaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- White v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Armstrong v. Security Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Emergency Aid Insurance Co. v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.