Armstrong v. Security Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether Security Group Insurance is re quired to defend its named insureds in a law suit filed against them. To answer this question, we must determine the effect of an “intentional injury exclusion clause” in the policy.
Security issued a policy of liability insurance to Mary Ann and William Cofield d/b/a Lakeview Sandwich Shop. During grand opening of the new sandwich shop, a fight broke out in the crowded shop over ownership of a beer. Appellant, John Armstrong, was involved in the altercation. Insured William Cofield, who was helping…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- M. R. Thomason, Contractor, a Partnership Composed of M. R. Thomason, D. B. Holt, Jr., and Others v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Aponaug Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Emergency Aid Insurance Co. v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Murphree v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3Cited by26 opinions
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Unigard Mutual Insurance v. Spokane School District No. 81Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Northwestern National Casualty Co. v. PhalenMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Alabama Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- American States Insurance Company v. Alexis BorborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.