Fortson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
HlNES, Justice.
Tracy Lea Fortson appeals her convictions for malice murder and attempted arson in connection with the death of Douglas Benton. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. Fortson contends that the State presented only circumstantial evidence that did not exclude all reasonable hypotheses except that of her guilt. See OCGA § 24-4-6.
[Questions as to the reasonableness of hypotheses are generally to be decided by the jury which heard the evidence and where the jury is authorized to find that the evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Slaughter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Bufford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.