Legal Opinion

Bufford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2013No. A12A1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCFADDEN, Judge.

After a jury trial, Robert Austin Bufford was convicted of child molestation and aggravated child molestation. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence regarding his appearance at the time of his arrest and that his trial counsel was ineffective because she did not object to this evidence. Because Bufford has waived appellate review of the admission of the evidence, and because he has not met his burden of demonstrating that his counsel’s failure to object to the evidence constituted deficient performance, we affirm.

1. Facts.

The incident at issue in this case…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Benham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. McClarity v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boddie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Antonio Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
  3. Kenneth Wayne Boddie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. Michael Thomas Day, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  5. Thomas Ary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API