Legal Opinion
McNaughton v. Dillingham Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1983No. 82-3211PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYLE, District Judge:
This is an action brought by a union member under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185 against both his former employer, Dillingham Corporation, and his local union. On December 12, 1980, defendant Dillingham discharged plaintiff for alleged sexual harassment of another employee. Plaintiff protested his discharge to his union. Subsequently, the Local, acting as plaintiff’s representative, submitted plaintiff’s grievance to Dillingham. Representatives of the union and the employer met for the purpose of adjusting plaintiff’s ' grievance. On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Acri v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lee O. Edwards, Jr. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 36, Building Material and Dump Truck DriversCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Buscemi v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Teamsters Union Local 315 v. Great Western Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Carmelo Reyes Barina v. Gulf Trading And Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.