Legal Opinion

Edblad v. Brower

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1929No. 27,459PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant, Lee Brower, appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Plaintiff was .injured in an automobile accident which happened about one o’clock in the morning of May 5, 1928, on the 18-foot paved state highway running between Carlton and Cloquet. The circumstances were these:

As one Gardner, his wife, and plaintiff were driving on this highway from Cloquet towards Carlton the righthand rear tire of their automobile went flat, and they stopped to change tires, the car being almost vvholly off the pavement. All got out of the car and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Childs v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Kennedy v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Carter v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Denson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Johnson v. MalloryNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Robinson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API