Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Tweel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2003No. 02AP-784 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCormac, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Ruth A. McDermott, as the executor of the estate of her late husband, Joseph R. McDermott (“decedent”), appeals from awards of summary judgment granted by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendants-appellees, Charles Tweel, M.D., and Victor VerMeulen, M.D. Dr. Tweel cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for partial summary judgment.

{¶ 2} In October 1996, decedent presented to his long-time family physician, Dr. Tweel, complaining of a sore throat and hoarseness. Dr. Tweel observed that decedent had some…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marcantonio v. MoenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Haney v. Barringer, 06 Ma 141 (12-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Duck v. CantoniOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Pla v. Cleveland State Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Rosenberger v. PaduchikOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API