United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant, the United Keetoo-wah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma (“UKB”), is challenging a final agency action by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) whieh drastically reduced the federal funding that the UKB received for housing under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (NAHASDA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 4101-4243. The basis of the UKB’s claim, in essence, is that HUD’s decision was arbitrary and capricious (1) as a substantive matter because HUD’s regulations implementing NAHASDA were…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berneike v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Albert Inv. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- HOBBS EX. REL. HOBBS v. ZendermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.