Legal Opinion
DiGiorgio Corp. v. Mendez and Co., Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 8, 2002No. CIV.A. 99-3520PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Plaintiff DiGiorgio Corporation (“DiGiorgio”) and third party defendant A. Cordero Badillo, Inc. (“Grande”) move for summary judgment on the counterclaims of defendant Mendez and Co., Inc. (“Mendez”). In its counterclaims, Mendez alleges tortious interference by DiGiorgio and Grande with Mendez’s alleged relationships with certain grocery suppliers and seeks declaratory judgment that certain contracts between DiGiorgio and Grande are void. Mendez also brings a cross-motion seeking additional discovery. For the reasons below, DiGiorgio’s and Grande’s motions are…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- White Plains Coat & Apron Co., Inc. v. Cintas Corp. And Cintas Corp. 2, Docket No. 05-1520-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Mylan Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- MaxLite, Inc. v. ATG Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Ruder v. Pequea Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.