Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Roxboro Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1959No. 37501PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. Lien statutes, being in derogation of the common law, must be strictly construed. Cowart v. Reeves, 80 Ga. App. 161 (55 S. E. 2d 911). The materialman’s claim of lien filed for record must be in substance in the language of Code (Ann.) § 67-2002(2). Under this statute the statement that the lien is claimed “upon certain premises or real estate of Roxboro Homes, Inc.” is an allegation that Roxboro Homes, Inc., is the owner of the real estate for the improvement of which the labor and materials were furnished. Ford v. Wilson, 85 Ga. 109, 114 (11 S. E. 559).

Decided January 16,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James G. Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Chamberlin-Johnson-Dubose Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Ford v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Cowart v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Broxton Artificial Stone Works v. JowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Marathon Metallic Building Co. v. Texas National Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. A & a Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Ansley Park Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Mikart, Inc. (In Re Mikart, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
  5. Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wegmiller Bender Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API