Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cooley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1982No. 1509PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief. We reverse and remand so that appellant may file an appeal nunc pro tunc.

Appellant was convicted of burglary by a judge sitting without a jury. After post-verdict motions were made and denied he was sentenced to 3 to 15 years in prison. He was represented in these proceedings by a public defender.

The day after.the imposition of sentence appellant wrote from Graterford Prison requesting counsel to file an appeal. He received a reply from the chief of the appeals division of the public defender’s office stating: that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. MirandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. DockinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. McKnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. WaringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Com. v. Marks, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API