Commonwealth v. Waring
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA). 1 Appellant argues in this appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to file a timely direct appeal to this Court. 2 For the reasons stated below, the trial court order is vacated and the case remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
Appellant pleaded guilty to conspiracy, burglary, and robbery. On February 14, 1983, the trial court sentenced appellant to ten to twenty years on the burglary charge, ten to twenty years on the robbery…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Commonwealth v. BronaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BronaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. GillySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988