Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Waring

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 10, 1987No. 2977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s petition for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA). 1 Appellant argues in this appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to file a timely direct appeal to this Court. 2 For the reasons stated below, the trial court order is vacated and the case remanded for an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant pleaded guilty to conspiracy, burglary, and robbery. On February 14, 1983, the trial court sentenced appellant to ten to twenty years on the burglary charge, ten to twenty years on the robbery…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. BronaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. BronaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. GillySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API