Legal Opinion

Russell v. Newman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1924No. 25,092PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

J. R. Russell sued J. R. Newman and C. F. Young, physicians and surgeons, for malpractice, alleging that after removing his right kidney on May 30, 1919, they had negligently left within the incision a surgical gauze, sponge four or five inches long and about an inch and a half in diameter, which remained there without discovery until August 7, 1919. A verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, awarding him, however, only one dollar. He appeals, relying upon the proposition that inasmuch as the verdict necessarily amounted to a finding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sundgren v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Bracken v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Walker Hospital v. PulleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Webb v. LungstrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Collins v. MeekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Henderson v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Rodgers v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API