Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1986No. WCB 83-04541; CA A36412PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing a referee’s order which allowed claimant’s aggravation claim and dismissing the claim as untimely filed. The issues are (1) whether the claim was timely filed, and (2) if so, whether claimant proved a worsening of his compensable condition. ORS 656-.273(l). We hold that the claim was timely filed but that claimant failed to prove a worsening. We therefore affirm.

On March 10,1977, claimant suffered a compensable low back injury. The claim was closed by a determination order on September 27, 1977. Claimant continued to work…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Wetzel v. Goodwin Bros.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Stepp v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Miller v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Consolidated Freightways v. FousheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Baustian v. Consolidated FreightwaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API