Legal Opinion

People v. Garner

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1989No. B030356PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, J.

Defendant Roderick Garner appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of second degree murder, He makes numerous contentions whose merit, or lack thereof, need not detain us since this proceeding was so fundamentally flawed from its inception that its result cannot possibly be sustained.

The prosecution’s entire case-in-chief consisted solely of (1) an autopsy report indicating that a Phillip Matthews had died “as a consequence of multiple gunshot wounds,” and (2) a reading into the record of the testimony given by the one and only…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John WINDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William MERKLE, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. People v. ErvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. CroslandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. John WINDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William MERKLE, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. People v. ErvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API