Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Crosland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1990No. 1186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

We here consider an appeal from the judgment of sentence to a term of life imprisonment, 1 imposed after a jury found appellant guilty of murder in the second degree, robbery, and possession of an instrument of crime. Since we find that the Commonwealth’s use of the prior inculpatory testimony of a witness who was unavailable at trial due to the exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege, under the circumstances of this case, violated the appellant’s rights under Article 1, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, as well as those guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. BujanowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Com. v. Ayoub, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Commonwealth v. BryanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API