Legal Opinion
John WINDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William MERKLE, Respondent-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1998No. 97-15455PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
163 F.3d 1092
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9164, 98 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 12,819
John WINDHAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William MERKLE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 97-15455.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 4, 1998.*
Decided Dec. 17, 1998.
John W. Windham, Pro Per, Susanville, California, petitioner-appellant.
Harry Joseph Colombo, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Garland E. Burell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-1278-GEB.
Before:…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- (HC) Allen v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Oquita v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC)Kakowski v. PollardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Xavier Fort v. Neil McDowellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019