Legal Opinion
State v. Koperski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 6, 2000No. CX-99-2044PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY * , Judge.
Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the trial court’s order clarifying its August 26, 1999 order and changing respondent’s five-year period of conditional release, imposed as part of his 1995 sentence, to run from January 14, 1999, not April 13, 2001, as determined by the Department of Corrections. Because the sentence originally imposed was inconsistent with Minnesota law, we affirm.
FACTS
On January 27, 1995, respondent Mark Koperski was sentenced to 81 months in prison for third-degree criminal sexual conduct. Koperski was to serve 54 months of prison…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. FleminoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BorregoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Minnesota, ex rel. Demetris L. Duncan v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.