Legal Opinion

Clark v. Mulcahy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 1, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgments in these two cases and, while each case is presented by a separate record and briefs, both cases were argued together before us.

On May 17, 1968, the plaintiffs in the first case (No. 6753), state policemen of the state of Connecticut, instituted an action for a declaratory judgment, naming as defendants the commissioner of state police, the state treasurer, the personnel commissioner and the members of the personnel policy board of the state of Connecticut. Sought were determinations of whether, pursuant to Public Act No. 657 of 1967, (now §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. State v. SpringerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Bridgeport v. D'AulisaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. Liebeskind v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Muha v. United Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Heffernan v. SlapinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Pierce v. LantzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Duplin v. Shiels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Ferro v. MorganConnecticut Superior Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API