Legal Opinion
Duplin v. Shiels, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 6, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs, Paula and Bonnie Duplin and their father, Eli Duplin, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the two minors, then eight and seven years of age, and for expenses incurred by their father. The jury found the issues for the defendant, and from the judgment in its favor the plaintiffs have appealed.
The sole assignment of error before us for consideration relates to the trial court’s instruction to the jury. The correctness of the charge is determined by the claims of proof of the parties. Practice Book § 635; DiPalma v. Wiesen, 163 Conn. 293, 295,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Darling v. Burrone Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Busko v. DeFilippoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- City of Meriden v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Neal v. Shiels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. BeautonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.