Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Lantz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 10, 2009No. AC 29411PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The plaintiff, Andre M. Pierce, an inmate in a state correctional institution, appeals to this court after his administrative appeal, brought in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), General Statutes § 4-166 et seq., challenging “regulations” of the department of correction (department) was dismissed in Superior Court. The plaintiff complained in his “petition,” filed with the department, that certain department regulations involving censorship of mail, compact discs and cassette tapes, as well as a 30 percent markup on compact discs and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Salmon Brook Convalescent Home, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rios v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Baltas v. ErfeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Baltas v. MaigaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Benjamin v. Dept. of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Emerick v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.