Snowball Corp. v. Pope
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
This dispute concerns ownership of an unimproved parcel of real estate located in Brownsburg, Indiana, Plaintiff-appellant Snowball Corporation (Snowball) initiated an action to quiet title to land it claimed it owned. Defendant-appellees Leo and Beulah Locke Pope (the Popes) counterclaimed on a theory of adverse possession. From an adverse judgment in favor of the Popes, Snowball appeals and raises two issues for our review:
1. Whether the ten years in which a true owner must oust an adverse claimant is stayed if the owner is unaware of its true ownership.
2. Whether the Popes'…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Craven v. CravenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- McCarty v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Abel v. LoveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Carter v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rieddle v. BucknerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.