Legal Opinion

Snowball Corp. v. Pope

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1991No. 32A01-9103-CV-78PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This dispute concerns ownership of an unimproved parcel of real estate located in Brownsburg, Indiana, Plaintiff-appellant Snowball Corporation (Snowball) initiated an action to quiet title to land it claimed it owned. Defendant-appellees Leo and Beulah Locke Pope (the Popes) counterclaimed on a theory of adverse possession. From an adverse judgment in favor of the Popes, Snowball appeals and raises two issues for our review:

1. Whether the ten years in which a true owner must oust an adverse claimant is stayed if the owner is unaware of its true ownership.

2. Whether the Popes'…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Marathon Petroleum Co. v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Craven v. CravenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McCarty v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Abel v. LoveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Carter v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Rieddle v. BucknerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API