Legal Opinion
McBride v. Minstar, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 29, 1994PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
283 N.J. Super. 471 (1994)
662 A.2d 592
JOSEPH MCBRIDE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MINSTAR, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Monmouth County.
Decided June 29, 1994.
Michael D. Schottland, Schottland, Aaron & Manning, Freehold, for plaintiffs.
Samuel A. DeGonge, Belleville, for defendant Raichle Molitor USA, Inc.
FISHER, J.S.C.
This case gives rise to a number of difficult questions concerning the legal effect of an exculpatory clause contained in a contract to sell ski equipment. Because these agreements are commonly used in the ski industry and the problems encountered…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Soc. Hill Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Soc. Hill Assoc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Gonzalez v. Ideal Tile Importing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Dare v. Freefall Adventures, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- McBride v. Raichle Molitor, USANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Newman v. Isuzu Motors AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.