Legal Opinion
McBride v. Raichle Molitor, USA
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 17, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
283 N.J. Super. 422 (1995)
662 A.2d 567
JOSEPH MCBRIDE AND LAURIE MCBRIDE, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS,
v.
RAICHLE MOLITOR, USA, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT, AND MINSTAR, INC., TRADING AS TYROLIA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 7, 1995.
Decided July 17, 1995.
Before Judges SHEBELL and WALLACE.
Michael D. Schottland argued the cause for appellants (Schottland, Aaron & Manning, attorneys; Mr. Schottland and Nicholas C. Caliendo, on the brief).
Samuel A. DeGonge argued the cause for respondent (Law Offices of Samuel A. DeGonge, attorneys; Mr. DeGonge, of counsel;…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McBride v. Minstar, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
3Cited by14 opinions
- Soc. Hill Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Soc. Hill Assoc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Gonzalez v. Ideal Tile Importing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Dare v. Freefall Adventures, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Newman v. Isuzu Motors AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Harmon v. Mt. Hood Meadows, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.