Legal Opinion

Brotherton v. Street

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1890No. 14,397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellant is founded upon a promissory note, negotiable by the law merchant, executed by the appellees, and payable to Thomas J. McElroy. It is alleged that McElroy wrote on the back of the note these words: “ I sign this note to N. H. Garretson, without recourse,” and that he affixed his signature. We think this was such an endorsement of the note as passed title to Garretson, although there is a plain misuse of words, for the intent to vest title in Garretson is clear, and this intent it is the duty of the courts to carry into effect. It is further alleged that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dunham v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Merchants National Bank v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Howard v. KincaidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Lynn v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API