Legal Opinion

Howard v. Kincaid

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1915No. 5286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Woodward County; James W. Steen, Judge. Action by Arthur O. Kincaid and another against C. M. Howard. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendadnt brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Woodward county October 1, 1910, by Arthur O. Kincaid- and Maud M. Kin-caid, to cancel certain notes and mortgages executed and delivered by them to the Western National Insurance Company, alleging that the same had been procured by fraud and misrepresentation.

The Western National Insurance Company answered by way of general denial, and, further, that one of the notes mentioned in the petition had -been transferred to and become the property of another. Thereafter C. M. Howard was permitted to intervene, and he alleged…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Merrill v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Tescher v. MereaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Germania National Bank of Milwaukee v. MarinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Goolsby v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Yeldell v. Bank of ElmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API