Legal Opinion

Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 27, 2004No. 1-03-1559PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garcia

This interlocutory appeal stems from the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s, Woodfield Nissan, Inc. (Woodfield), motion to dismiss and compel arbitration. In July 2002, the plaintiff, Nadejda Vassilkovska, purchased a used automobile from Woodfield. In addition to the sales contract, the plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement (Arbitration Agreement). In February 2003, the plaintiff filed a four-count complaint against Woodfield. In April 2003, Woodfield filed a motion to dismiss and compel arbitration. In May 2003, the trial court heard arguments on Woodfield’s motion and denied it.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Borowiec v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bishop v. We Care Hair Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Vassilkovska v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API