Legal Opinion
United States v. Moe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 4, 2008No. 07-3772PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Brent Moe appeals his two-count conviction for aiding and abetting the robbery of a credit union. Moe specifically contends that the district court 1 erred when it considered and denied his requests for a continuance outside Moe’s presence. Moe also asserts that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the guilty verdicts. 2 We disagree. Moe’s absence did not prevent a fair and just hearing on the continuance and in light of all the circumstances, we cannot conclude that the district court abused its discretion by denying Moe’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ChahiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mikeem DanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Joe ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Nicholas Gonzales-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.