Legal Opinion
United States v. Mikeem Daniel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2018No. 16-4534PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Mikeem Daniel appeals after a jury convicted him of (1) aiding and abetting the interference with commerce by robbery, and (2) aiding and abetting the possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the convictions. Daniel also argues that the district court 1 erred in denying a motion to suppress and in its jury instructions. We affirm.
I. Background
"We recite the facts in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict." United States v. Payne-Owens , 845 F.3d 868 , 870 n.2 (8th Cir. 2017) (quoting…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. Thomas Lee FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Beth GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Julius JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Nicholas Ryan HemsherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Daniel BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Calmer CottierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.