Legal Opinion

State v. Herrera

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1981No. 7405; CRIMINAL NO. 52010PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

On March 19, 1979, appellants Carlos A. Herrera and Arthur Cummins, III, were jointly tried for rape in the first degree (§ 707-730(l)(a)(i), Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS)), sodomy in the first degree (§ 707-733(l)(a)(i), HRS) and robbery in the first degree (§ 708-840(l)(b)(ii), HRS) in the circuit court of the first judicial circuit and were convicted of the latter two offenses. From their convictions, this appeal was taken.

We consider only two of the issues raised by this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in denying appellants’ motions to dismiss under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oak Park National Bank v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. State v. SotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hettleman v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  4. Matsumoto v. KakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. LordHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. State v. MillerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. NelsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. BaronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. LobendahnHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API