Legal Opinion

State v. Soto

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1981No. 7773PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Once again we are required to deal with the problem of interpreting the speedy trial provisions of Rule 48(b), Hawaii Rules of Pena] Procedure (HRPP). This appeal by the State raises the question of whether under HRPP Rule 48(c)(1) the six-month period within which an accused must be brought to trial is tolled by reason of any proceedings concerning the accused on account of pretrial motions filed by him. And, if it is tolled, it raises a further question: What period is required to be tolled? For reasons set forth herein, we reverse.

I

Of a multiple-count indictment against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. MersebergHawaii Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HoeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SamonteHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HerreraHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hawaii v. NihipaliHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. WassonHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API