Banovic v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge.
This is a suit to interpret a will. From an adverse decision, the plaintiff has appealed.
The issue stated by appellant is as follows:
Is Mai jenko Victor Banovic, the adopted son of Mrs. Maree Meriwether Fi-guers, entitled to the corpus of a trust which was left to Mrs. Figuers for life with remainder to her issue?
The facts are stipulated. Facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows.
On September 9, 1944, testatrix executed a will and a codicil thereto, both prepared by counsel.
On April 30, 1945, both will and codicil were republished by an instrument prepared by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turner Bros. v. Argo & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. ManderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Third Nat. Bank v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Ross v. BatemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Union Planters National Bank v. CorbittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lanier v. RainsTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Third National Bank in Nashville v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Calhoun v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Wright v. BrandonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Dr. Victor W. Horadam v. Sue Stewart, of the Estate of Andre Alice NortonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.