Legal Opinion

Ross v. Bateman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peewitt

The bill was filed by Helen Bateman Hayes for a construction of the will of Judge T. P. Bateman, and especially item seven and twenty-one of his will.

The complainant, Helen Bateman Hayes, is an adopted daughter of W. D. Bateman, and claims that she is entitled to the property bequeathed and devised to her adoptive father under said will. The Chancellor held that the will did not intend to include an adopted child, or children, and dismissed the bill. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Judge Bateman executed the original will on April 22, 1909. He executed one codicil on August 31, 1911, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mooney v. TollesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trueax v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Banovic v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. Calhoun v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Union Planters National Bank v. CorbittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  5. Jorge Acosta Rubio v. Tony Parker, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API