Legal Opinion

Hycarbex, Inc. v. Anglo-Suisse, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 6, 1996No. 14-94-00728-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE, Justice.

Appellants, Hycarbex, Inc. (“Hyearbex”), Moin Hussain (“Hussain”), and Kumar Bhat-tacharjee (“Kumar”) sued appellees, Anglo-Suisse, Inc. and Anglo-Suisse Pakistan (collectively referred to as “Anglo-Suisse”), for breach of an agreement to pay commissions. 1 At the close of Hycarbex’s evidence, Anglo-Suisse moved for directed verdict on the following grounds: (1) Hycarbex failed to prove that Anglo-Suisse breached the agreement by failing to pay all the commissions owed; and (2) Anglo-Suisse proved accord and satisfaction as a matter of law. During Anglo-Suisse’s…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Milton M. Cooke Co. v. First Bank and Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. Augusta Court Co-Owners' Ass'n v. Levin, Roth & Kasner, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Hill v. Bartlette, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. Case Funding Network, L.P. v. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API