Hycarbex, Inc. v. Anglo-Suisse, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE, Justice.
Appellants, Hycarbex, Inc. (“Hyearbex”), Moin Hussain (“Hussain”), and Kumar Bhat-tacharjee (“Kumar”) sued appellees, Anglo-Suisse, Inc. and Anglo-Suisse Pakistan (collectively referred to as “Anglo-Suisse”), for breach of an agreement to pay commissions. 1 At the close of Hycarbex’s evidence, Anglo-Suisse moved for directed verdict on the following grounds: (1) Hycarbex failed to prove that Anglo-Suisse breached the agreement by failing to pay all the commissions owed; and (2) Anglo-Suisse proved accord and satisfaction as a matter of law. During Anglo-Suisse’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Alvarado v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Daugherty v. Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Milton M. Cooke Co. v. First Bank and Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
- Augusta Court Co-Owners' Ass'n v. Levin, Roth & Kasner, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Hill v. Bartlette, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Case Funding Network, L.P. v. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.