Legal Opinion

Derringer v. Turney

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2001No. 21,059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} After the state engineer entered an adverse decision on his application for a permit to acquire water rights, Appellant David Derringer appealed to the district court. The Seventh Judicial District Court dismissed his appeal on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction over it because Derringer had not served the other parties — Mick and Jennifer Chapel (the Chapels), and the state engineer — within the required time. Derringer now appeals to this Court, and we reverse the district court’s order of dismissal and instruct the district court to remand this case to the state…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Angel Fire Corp. v. C. S. Cattle Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. US Xpress v. Taxation and Revenue Dept.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Anthony Water & Sanitation District v. TurneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. D'ANTONIO v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Storm Ditch v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API