US Xpress v. Taxation and Revenue Dept.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHÁVEZ, Justice.
{1} This ease requires us to decide whether the Tax Administration Act permits the courts to recognize the doctrine of “vicarious” or “virtual” exhaustion of remedies to allow a class action to proceed when only a few members of the proposed class have exhausted their administrative remedies. Because the Tax Administration Act provides the exclusive remedies for tax refunds and requires the taxpayer to individually seek the refund, we decline to adopt vicarious or virtual exhaustion for proceedings under the Tax Administration Act, and reverse the opinion of the Court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Lion's Gate Water v. D'ANTONIONew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Barnes v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Rivera-Platte v. First Colony Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rivera-Platte v. First Colony Life InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.