Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Witham

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 31, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This is an automobile tort action to recover on a claim of negligence against the individual defendant and under G.L.c. 93A for the corporate defendant’s alleged unfair settlement practices in violation of G.L.c. 176D. Pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 5, the trial judge has reported his rulings on the defendants’ motions to sever the tort and G.L.c. 93A claims for trial and on the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery.

Plaintiff Magdalena Sanchez (“Sanchez”) allegedly sustained injuries when the vehicle she was driving was struck in the rear by a rented automobile operated by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Dobos v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. LeClair v. Town of NorwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chery v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Gillis v. Peerless InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013
  3. Mercado v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  4. Rodriguez v. AlveloMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API