Legal Opinion
Chery v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided October 13, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff has appealed the allowance of summary judgment for the defendant-insurer on her claims for G.L.c. 90, §34M personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits and G.Lc. 93A, §9 damages, attorney’s fees, and costs. There was no error.
Plaintiff Marie Chery (“Chery”) sustained injuries in an automobile accident on February 7, 2007 while riding as a passenger in a vehicle insured by defendant Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”). On *211February 11, 2007, Chery was examined and had X-rays at the emergency department of Caritas Good Samaritan Medical Center…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Polaroid Corp. v. the Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chery v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
- Garcia v. 128 Sales, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009